OPTIMASI KOEFISIEN PARAMETER HIDROGRAF SATUAN SINTETIK ITB-1 DAN ITB-2 DI SUB DAS BIONGA KAYUBULAN

  • Endrizal Rahman Iyan Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Barry Yusuf Labdul Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
  • Rawiyah Husnan Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Abstract

The reduction of the unit hydrograph from the observed flood hydrograph is an important factor in water construction planning. However, it is difficult to obtain observational flood hydrograph data in the form of AWRL (Automatic Water Level Recorder) and ARR (Automatic Rainfall Recorder) data. Hence, the hydrograph reduction known as synthetic unit hydrograph (SUH) is developed. One of the synthetic hydrographs developed in Indonesia is SUHof ITB-1 and ITB-2. Based on this rationale, this study aimed to analyze the SUH of ITB-1 and ITB-2 in the Bionga Kayubulan sub-watershed. The Straight Line Method was employed to separate the base flow from the run-off in order to obtain a direct run-off hydrograph. In analyzing the effective rain, the study utilized the Φ index equation. Further, the direct run-off and effective rain hydrograph were reduced to the observation unit hydrograph using the Collins method. Additionally, Microsoft Excel-Solver software was used to optimize the SUH of ITB-1 and ITB-2 coefficients on the hydrograph of the observation unit. The hydrograph of the observation unit in the Bionga Kayubulan sub-watershed attained 4.5 hours peak time (Tp) with 2.81 /s peak discharge (Qp). The ITB-1 synthetic hydrograph in the site area attained 5.97 hours peak time (Tp) with 1.96 /s peak discharge (Qp), while the ITB-2 synthetic hydrograph attained 5.97 hours peak time (Tp) with 2.45 /s peak discharge (Qp). The calibration results of ITB-1 synthetic unit hydrograph with changed coefficient parameters showed the time coefficient (Ct) of 0.73, the peak coefficient (Cp) of 1.07, and alpha (α) of 1.60. Further, for the SUH of ITB-2, the results showed a time coefficient (Ct) of 0.73, a peak coefficient (Cp) of 0.96, alpha (α) of 2.50, and beta (β) of 0.95.

Keywords: Optimization Coefficient, SUH of ITB-1 and ITB-2

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agus, I., 2011. Perbandingan Hidrograf Satuan Teoritis Terhadap Hidrograf Satuan Observasi DAS Ciliwung Hulu. Jurnal Teoretis dan Terapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil, pp. 55-70.

Aliu, S. W., 2013. Perbandingan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Snyder Dengan Hidrograf Satuan Pengamatan Pada Sub DAS Bionga Kayubulan. Gorantalo: Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.

Hadisusanto, N., 2010. Aplikasi Hidrologi. Malang: Jogja Mediautama.

Idji, S. K., 2013. Penyesuaian Koefisien Parameter Model Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik Gama 1 Pada Sub DAS Bionga Kayubulan, Gorontalo: Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.

Limantara, L. M., 2010. Rekayasa Hidrologi. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Mulyono, D., 2014. Analisis Karakteristik Curah Hujan Di Wilayah Kabupaten Garut Selatan. Vol. 13 No. 1 2014, pp. 1-9.

Natakusumah, D. K., 2011. Prosedur Umum Perhitungan Hidrograf Satuan Sintetis dengan Cara ITB dan Beberapa Contoh Penerapannya. Jurnal Teoretis dan Terapan Bidang Rekayasa Sipil, pp. 254-257.

Pattiselanno, S. . R., 2017. Mitigasi Karakter Muka Air Banjir Dari Mofometri DAS Wai Loning – Negeri Laha, Berbasis Geographic Information System. Jurnal Simetrik, pp. 1-7.

Safrida, M. F. A., 2014. Analisis Hidrograf Aliran Daerah aliran Sungai Tirtomoyo Dengan Beberapa Metode Hidrograf Satuan Sintetik , Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret.

SNI, 1989. Pedoman Perencanaan Hidrologi dan Hidraulik Untuk Bangunan Di Sungai. Badan Standardisasi Nasional, p. 2.

Triatmodjo, B., 2008. Hidrologi Terapan. Yogyakarta: Beta Offset.

Yunagardasar, C., 2017. Model Infiltrasi Pada Berbagai Penggunaan Lahan Di Desa Tulo Kecamatan Dolo Kabupaten Sigi. e-J. Agrotekbis 5, pp. 315-325.

Published
2022-06-10
Abstract viewed = 338 times PDF downloaded = 743 times